You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: That's correct. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's correct.
It is important to keep in mind that Mr. Rove has testified three times thus far. After he had testified that he had not soken to Matt Cooper, Ms. Novak had lunch with Rove's attorney. She told him that Cooper would eventually be forced to testify that Rove was indeed his source. More, Time was prepared to turn over documentation of Cooper's discussion if the federal courts ruled against them.

Keep in mind that Cooper's notes indicated that Rove requested "super secret background" status.

When Luskin informed Rove of this, Karl went back and reviewed his records, including e-mails, etc. He found that indeed he had left a trail .... the note to Hadley that confirmed he had spoken to Cooper about Plame.

In the days following Cooper's grand jury testimony, it was reported that Luskin called Fitzgerald and offered to testify again.

At this point, Fitzgerald is checking to see if Ms. Novak's "story" matches Luskin's. Even if it does match exactly, the fact remains that Rove lied to FBI investigators and to the grand jury, and only changed his testimony once he was confronted with solid documentation he had lied. He could face the same charges as Libby, at this point.

What is happening now, however, is that Luskin is attempting to make a deal for Rove. In return for no charges being filed against Karl, he might have his memory jogged to the point that he could recall some more information about another senior administration official's role in at least the cover-up. For the sake of this discussion, I will refer to this official by a code name .... "Dick Cheney."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC