Reply #32: If Saddam had actually had nukes

[Noisy Democrat]

and all the rest of that fantasy arsenal, then I would say we should've blown him to kingdom come. Because then Saddam would've been a serious danger, and in violation of umpteen UN resolutions, and we should've taken him out.

Most of us agree that the fact that he *didn't* have weapons, and Bush knew it, is what makes the war illegal and immoral. You're adding another spin -- that you would've been happy to let Saddam sit on a pile of WMDs. I don't know how many people will go along with you. I wouldn't.