Democratic Underground - Why don't you cite the many who have come to believe in fraud...

Reply #55: Why don't you cite the many who have come to believe in fraud... [View All]

TruthIsAll

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jul-10-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #52

55. Why don't you cite the many who have come to believe in fraud...

Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 01:38 AM by TruthIsAll

when they saw the evidence posted on the 2004 Election Forum?

They sure didn't see it on CBSABCMSNBCFOXCNNNYTWP.

Are you aware that the percentage who believe the election was stolen was 20% in Nov. 2004 and is approching 50% today? Why do you think that happened?

It's only the belief that the election was stolen which can motivate us and provide the catalyst for the activism needed to fix the problem by installing verifiable paper ballots, among other things.

To say there wasn't enough fraud to turn the election, or that they all do it, is pure unadulterated BS.

The election WAS stolen in 2004.
The election WAS stolen in 2002.
The election WAS stolen in 2000.

What did you say in 2000?
Get over it; work harder next time?

What did you say in 2002?
Get over it; work harder next time?

What are you saying in 2004?
Get over it; work harder next time?

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

Reply #55: Why don't you cite the many who have come to believe in fraud... [View All]