You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #43: offended are we [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. offended are we
You accept a premise that the military is honourable. I don't
accept that. Each individual has a choice not to be there.

When you get old, you will no longer be in the military, and it will
no longer be personal for you, and you will not need to get in such
a huff.

I'm composing a meme, not an individual indictment. Individuals can pick it to use in indicting the military for gross negligence in protecting
a constitution they are sworn to protect. Rather than protect it, they
have stood by whilst it has been gutted, all the while collecting a
pay cheque.

That is what service has become, institutional deriliction where no
single individual is responsible. Then when we indict the
institution, we are "bigots" for indictng the indivdiauls, who are not responsible
by the very outset. No president is responsible, no defense
secreteary is responsible, no commanders are responsible, and not
a single line soldier is responsible eaither.... totall plausible
deniability and war crimes on 6 continents. Crimes happen, nobody
is responsible, and all accusers are bigots because they did not
select out the baddies... but the war crimes are institutional.

The american military will committ war crimes next year, and the
year after that. It is what a good many are trained to do, under
the auspices of defending the nation. It is deplorable, and for all
who think its honouralbe, thanks for defending the constitution,
its been so useful having so useless a defense.

The democrats and the republicans have sold out america, along with
the miltiary industrial complex, and it is not the least bit bigotry
to point this out. It is an accusation of impropriety and
deriliction of duty that needs to be levied at a good portion of the
miltiary command that has let this tragic state of affairs come to
fruition to start with. The same goes for the democrats, the republicans
and the civilians that we let this state of affairs come about to
start with.

So the straw man is a success. You are angry because you "KNOW"
that there is some truth to the accusation, that you ARE responsible
for the choices you made, that the military has not defended the
country for decades, and has instead been used for corporate
thuggery... the gap between 20 years of propaganda and the truth:
that it really has been mostly war crimes and that is "shameful".

Granted, those crimes were by a very few, and most of the rest were
just complicit gas chamber attendents, who, like most of the nazi
army took orders with their paycheques and thought it was honourable.

I know you're offended, and i'm not sorry. It is your
choice to be attached to your professional identity on an
anonymous chat board. It does not make me an elitist. IT
makes me a propagandist. Rove does bigotry to destroy democrats.
I do it to destroy evil institutions. The military propaganists
themselves have fucked up, and its no wonder recruitment is at a
terrible low these days.

People who are not slaves, are deciding not to vote "militarism"
with their own blood feet. They might not say "shameful" but the
results are the same. For all those jedi knights out there,
darth vader and his death star have shot up the constitution you're
defending so badly, that the presumption that a military force
defends it is laughable.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC