You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: it's very short sighted [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. it's very short sighted
and immensely regressive. Mostly only poorer people in older neighborhoods will be affected.

Most of the time you only get land + improvement value, and for an old house that's not even a quarter of what you need to buy a house of equal size on a lot of equal size. If you're retired and you don't have income, you won't qualify for a mortgage to purchase another home, so you're basically on the street.

I am completely baffled by the decision.

The only thing concerned citizens can do is change their city charters through democratic action, and screw the supreme court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC