You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #61: I thought not [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #45
61. I thought not
I think the only thing that has changed is your interpretation of my very clear words. I say nothing about the current state of the law or what needs to be changed, but I do say what I think regulation should do: keep firearms away from those who would use them to recklessly endanger the lives of others; heavily regulate (but don't ban) military-style rifles so that responsible collectors can get them but criminals can't. Thanks for putting words in my mouth, but if I wanted to say we needed more laws or that all DUers support violent criminal gun ownership, that's what I would have said.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC