You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #231: There is a narrow definition [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
231. There is a narrow definition
and narrow historical framework in using those terms. No, they don't clearly apply and the two parties are difficult to define anyway except as corporatism and national reform run amok. What is more disturbing is to take more clear trajectories of certain kinds of power movements, elites, thuggery, warrior cults, nationalism, Neo-elitism versus older royalty(who once were exactly the same thing). American No-Nothings and bigots, weak minded cowards suddenly thrust into vengeful authority, the same behavior, same thought, same failures, same results, etc.

Bad guys aren't always super villains but often troubled psyches freed from conventional bounds to appear as opportune geniuses in manipulating power from the peaceful norm or decadent establishment. The ranks identify the leadership in their real character by magnifying flaws and weaknesses and human failings and especially failures. Like seeks like and those out of power seek to accommodate.

People in the middle can be brutalized as the Resistance is is polarized and swung to mere reaction and destruction. These types are a fanatic corrupting force, simple minded and deceptive, contradictory(hard thus to define our talk with or about). Aggressive-fearful-defensive-belligerent-cowardly.

Sparta as a culture formed itself into a model of this behavior which IS alarming. That is the model for the worst to come. Children formed from birth to be like that, but in the end cunning, treacherous cowardice is the hallmark of these fearsome warriors. they were the model of the autocratic Plato's Republic(equally scary when you think about it).

The definitions and appearances and crimes do not match. The type and the acts do. Nazis and fascists are comforting in that in an otherwise capitalist dominant era, they were miserably defeated and monstrous. The morality play was definitive and worked out DESPITE American corporate complicity unpunished and the big problem of RW advance unresolved in the confusion of the red herring Cold War. it was in fact a very false comfort. I have felt the shadow of WWII cast over every year of my life in this nation. Battles meant little compared to the corruption of our government to the present- without a shot being fired. Now we are in for the same sorry patterns again although by and large the people are kept dumber than ever not so much brutalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC