You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: You know how some people think that there... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Devils Advocate NZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
45. You know how some people think that there...
are people sent to try and debunk "Conspiracy Theories" by the conspirators, well if there ever was one, TomNickell would be the perfect example of what they would be like. Now, I am not saying he is a plant, but he sure doesn't help disprove it with his pathetic attempts to debunk "Conspiracy Theories" by ridiculing those who see merit in such "Theories".

I have never seen him post on any subject except "Conspiracy Theories". In fact he has been here an awfully long time yet still has only 400 posts. I can't search because I a have not donated, but I would be willing to bet you would never find more than a dozen posts of his that do not have anything to do with debunking "Conspiracy Theories".

I've locked horns with him many times in the past, and he has never won an argument on the basis of facts or evidence. In fact he has never even put forward a reasonable argument.

Take this thread for example. It is not beyond the realms of possibility that US covert operatives might car bomb someone who is seen as a threat, or even just to cause chaos, but by defining the argument in ridiculous terms, he hopes to ridicule those who present an actual reasoned argument.

But it is even worse - he is not just attacking any theory that this bomb may have US connections, but the idea that ANY "Conspiracy Theory" may validly point to US actions. In other words, he create a ridiculous "theory" then uses that as evidence that ALL "Theories" are ridiculous.

Yet he claims that HE is the reasonable one. Bollocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC