You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #38: Pame is in Pravda for God's Sake ! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Pame is in Pravda for God's Sake !
<<<snip>>>
The White House is stonewalling the investigation - as usual. Meridith outlines that only people on the "inside" could have the clearances to know who is doing what. The CIA can be discounted because they never talk to anyone - we can leave the CIA out of this. Our focus turns to the White House itself. My questions start with why Robert Novak published the story. Punishment for disclosure of such information is rather nasty.

Among some of the other words that can be applied is TREASON. Novak stuck his neck out and literally threw it in the noose himself. A true, law abiding, journalist is supposed to be above this sort of thing - it is one thing to criticize ones country, but to hand out highly classified material is quite another. To quote:

Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, codified as 50 U.S.C., Section 421 Protection of identities of certain United States undercover intelligence officers, agents, informants, and sources
(a) Disclosure of information by persons having or having had access to classified information that identifies covert agent

Whoever, having or having had authorized access to classified information that identifies a covert agent, intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined not more than $50,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.<<<snip>>>

The last paragraph mentions a strategy I never even considered:

<<<snip>>>
Now, to level the playing field flatter than a pancake - the Anti-Terrorist Act and the Patriot Act rushed through congress by the four horse"s asses of the apocalypse - the act that authorizes the Central Intelligenc<<<snipe Agency to investigate American citizens. According to those two acts, the CIA does not need Ashcroft to turn the FBI loose - the CIA can do the investigation themselves. This could make for some very interesting times ahead. You see, the CIA does not like people messin' with their own.<<<snip>>>

Michael Berglin


http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/399/14259_Plame.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC