Reply #334: Why not change the subject, moron.

[patcox2]

The post I am responding to asked why there weren't 100 visible floors standing stacked like pancakes.

It was an idiotic question. They were smashed in the fall.

Now you are saying, just exactly what, I don't know, and I am sure you don't either. I never said all of the concrete was reduced to 60 micron powder, so go slay your straw man elsewhere. Not that he's dead anyway. What are you suggesting, that only hidden explosives could have produced so much dust, only hidden explosives could have pulverized a significant portion of the concrete part of the structure? Or that aliens in UFOs stole the floors so that we would all be confused about what happened? What the hell are you suggesting?

Wow, in the face of your stunning logical proof I am truly tempted to abandon the scientific method, which of course relies on verifiable, repeatable observation, as opposed to the kind of inductive reasoning, highly logical of course, but completley divorced from reality, that produces absurdities like Aristotle's natural history and Lysenko's theories of inherited adaptation.