Reply #74: The film is heart stopping, but the circles are maddening

[peacetalksforall]

Everyone is going in circles. I, for one, never really knew anything about WT7 so I was trying to learn from these posts. Someone says it was the proximity, another said it was the 3 fuel tanks, another destabalization. I don't know much - I'll have to learn several key points not included here - how long after the 2nd aircraft did it go down, a layout of the geography (though the account of the former tenant-employee is very helpful), whether an internal fire is recognized and how long it burned before the collapse, and whether it burned from bottom to top...lots of things that are not being said here or in some other sequence. I have no time to read engineers words, but often layman basics can contribute greatly. Right now, based on the little data, my gut says that the collapse was perfect. It doesn't make sense that a reactive disaster such as this could be so clean. Just like taking down an old hotel in Vegas - on TV.

I now know, however, that I'll want to read a book or two about it, though if a book about the Pentagon crash comes out at the same time - I'll opt for the Pentagon book first.

The crash that wasn't or so it seems.

Does anyone to keep TWA in mind while this unravels?

I hope everyone continues to post articles about the the regimes lack of interest in releasing data - all in the name of national security, of course.

Due to national security = yeah right!