Reply #58: Not true at all.

[Sterling]

Now if you were talking about reall "terraists" then yes but the fact is Bushco needed very specific targets takin out with as little "colateral" damage as possible.

The towers were chosen for the shock value and it seems building 7 was chosen for more specific reasons.

Have you ever visited the WTC site. If you were there before and after you would be confused as to how two very tall buildings collapsed into their relitively small easments without damaging surrounding buildings.

Building 7 is even more confusing as all the other buildings around it are intact.

I believe if it was a controlled demolition it was done that way in an effort to minimize damage to other key parts of downtown like the Stock Exchange for example.

That would be far more damaging in the long term to our economy than the WTC itself.