You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #53: well how come it's neighbors didn't need to be torn down? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. well how come it's neighbors didn't need to be torn down?
if there was so much destruction in the area and if you study the film of the towers collapse they fell pretty much in their own footprints WITHOUT much heavy debrie being ejected so why was it's neighbors still standing?

and why did it's roof go just before it's base?

looks a little too clean to me but i admit i am not an expert, would love to hear what the 'OFFICIAL' theory is, though.

as to your second question, to cover it up as a target.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC