Reply #20: pro and con

[PATRICK]

are fighting over an information vacuum and disinformation glut. Wasting time might at least kep that coverup issue alive but tells us practically nothing. You can only guess and theorize and not blow that into a briliiant "discovery". People who coverup deserve to have people put pressure on them. Suspecting the worst or whackiest is no less out of line than being reasonable in fantasizing and giving stonewallers the benefit of the doubt.

For example, you could "guess" that the plane scramble failure was do to
a stand down order involving a CIA enactment of a terrorist attack on NY. The cosmic omelette on face coverup with other self-serving policy obfuscations. That's only a start because coincidence leads one to suspect this is very insufficient and leads necessarily to other suspicious coincidences.

The issue is coverup. The real and tangible conspiracy is enabling that coverup. Trying to find some easy startling evidence might cut through the layers but we are now years past 911 and decades past Kennedy. Guesses are just guesses(some very irritating and repugnant) no matter how many questions they might answer. You can't even get close to taking them to court. Hell, you can't even write a credible conspiracy book! How's that for coverup?