You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #186: Obviously they were. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #177
186. Obviously they were.
Edited on Fri Jun-11-04 04:41 PM by kgfnally
They fired the guy. FR instigated it.

The question is, did the employee confirm his DU screen name to his boss when confronted? If not, his boss fired him based upon pure, uncorroborated speculation. In that case, I would think he has a case against FR, the entity, for instigating his wrongful termination.

edit: added 'confirm' so it would make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC