You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #11: Hmmmm
[View All]
JawJaw
(574 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-13-03 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
A trademark is not supposed to be "deceptively misdescriptive" of the
goods the mark is used on. 15 U.S.C. § 1052. So, what you should do is you state a counterclaim under 15 U.S.C. § 1119 for cancelation of the Fox trademark registration because "fair and balanced" is "deceptively misdescriptive" of Fox News!"
You're a devious bastard, grytpype. But, i love the idea !!
Maybe this whole farce could form the basis for Franken's next book: "Fighting Fire With Fire"?
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread