Reply #241: As devil's advocate ....

[Pale_Rider]

If I use their system, Bev's team findings and the system requirements that you specified, I probably could do it now. Within a typical six-month election cycle, probably a few on this board could setup a rigged election. There are enough security lapses (nevermind modems, firmware, MS-Access)in the system design from what I've read so far.

Diebold has done nothing to address these security issues. And what this? They had to design their own motherboard? That's gotta be buggy as all hell. Hopefully they haven't used any of those faulty Taiwanese capacitors that leak all over the motherboard. I highly doubt these systems would comply with NSA guidelines.

Though the icing on the cake for the serious criminal conspiracy charge of vote rigging and product fraud, the law will still require a demonstrated pattern of irregularity and malicious conduct with these system and specific corporate executives.