You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: well... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. well...
Considering China was an advanced soceity some 5000 years ago with large population centers they too practiced some version of these basic tennets otherwise their society would have collapsed.

I think these rules are required to keep a society together. However, as with any large group of people gathered in one geographic location, there will always be some percentage that ignored/flaunts those rules.

The Mesapotamian empire ceased to exist as a sole power, in some estimation, hundreds of years before the old testament was written. But their legacy is still felt in several places in the bible. The story of Utnapishtim as told in the oldest recorded western story, Gilgamesh, precedes Noah's flood by several hundred years, but contains the same central events. The reasons for the flood though illustrate the different take the Mesapotamians had on their pantheon of Gods. In this tale Humans are a pain in the ass and therefore must we exterminated.

As for Hammurabi... The Mesapotamian empire was overtaken by the Egyptians, then the Greeks, then the Romans, then the Byzantines, then the Muslims, and since the laws were so detailed (like for example, the number of bags of grain one had to pay if you accidentally killed a neighbors waterbuffalo, or the ability to bring an arbiter to speak for you in front of an adjudicator, character witnesses, and costs in detail) they inevitably were simplified as these laws moved from early "urban" societies into the nomadic groups outside the established cities. Add hundred of years of conquest, societal mixing, and the end product is, what I think of as, gross oversimplification.

Again though, this only applies to the civil related portions of the commandments. The religion aspect, no god before me, no craven idols, sabbath hooey has no relation to civilization, but to establishing/maintaining a belief system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC