You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #4: let's take one of his non-sequitors...
[View All]
WMliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-09-04 12:18 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. let's take one of his non-sequitors... |
|
"Failure to protect us could be considered a treasonous act. If going to war is required to provide for the safety and common defense of all of us then it is "constitutional"
OK, what about when we go to war and it ISN'T required for our safety and defense.
Going into Iraq had nothing to do with that. Going into Afghanistan still hasn't gotten Bin Laden. I just listed a bunch of historical examples where we went in and it did not provide safety or defense.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread