Reply #19: It's not okay to screw with either

[Snoggera]

that is the point. If the unthinkable should happen, all should join together to reinstate it. If not, to be angry at all men is not rational. Having enough justices on the supreme court to overturn does not equate to having a majority of men agreeing.

It isn't convenient to wish to not harm or take away privacy rights to men. It also isn't convenient to do this to women.

Again, I understand anger at considering the possibility, but it does not create a reason for discriminating against men's rights.

If one sanctions the taking away of anyone's rights, I do not agree.