Reply #43: Hmmm

[AGD4y2357y]

"Show me a source, the law, for treasonous activity."

First of all I say there is no law indicating the action here is treason. I can't prove a negative. If you want to prove it IS a crime, then by all means show me the law you say exists.

"has heard the gist of what was in the 28 redacted pages"

Oh ok. And will this hearsay and conjecture be more or less credible than the "proof" Saddam was packing WMDs? If you went in to a court room saying this you'd be 100% guaranteed to be ruled against. Why? Because hearsay and conjecture have long been established NOT to be reliable forms of evidence. Of course the fact you accept hearsay and conjecture to be reliable probably explains why you are so far off from the start.

And don't come back with anything from www.conpiracyheory.com or the likes, as that won't hold any more weight either.

"The founding fathers were VERY wary of this sort of thing "

And they were also VERY wary of people such as your self going around accusing people of treason for everything under the sun. Do some research and figure out why treason is the ONLY crime that the constitution its self puts mandates for guilt on.