You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: Why Gay? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
47. Why Gay?
Why not a male homosexual?

Frankly...in the literal sense...at least in my world...you may or may not be gay. Gay in my world means happy or joyful, keenly alive and exuberant....it was not until fairly recently that the words etymology was hijacked. Should I insist that the homosexual community refrain from using the word "Gay" to describe their sexual proclivities? Should the innateness of homosexuality validate or invalidate it's use? Indeed...why not fag? Why not queer? What makes either of these words more or less acceptable or accurate than gay?

I don't understand your argument. What has a traits innateness to do with justification of the words used to describe behavior not solely attributable to that trait? If it were possible for a person to innately possess a bitchiness trait and inescapably display the behavior this word describes, how, would the effect such behavior evokes in others be different from that of a person who chose to behave as such? In either case they would be displaying a particularly remarkable behavior. One which in either case is hurtful to others. While I agree that true homosexuality is an innate trait....not all who engage in homosexual sex are innately homosexual. That is not the point, however. Do you equate the impact on others evoked by behavior described as bitchy with the impact on others of that evoked by your homosexuality? To take your argument seriously one must assume that you do....and that, my friend, is the point. You see...behavior is behavior...it matters not whether such behavior finds it's origins in an inherent characteristic....but in it's effect on bystanders.

Your homosexuality does not effect me. A person who displays malicious, spiteful behavior and depends upon the protections societal norms afford those who possess a feminine nature is distinctly different than one who displays the same sorts of behavior with the understanding it might very well yield them an extremely harsh rebuttal. This sort of behavior does effect me....it is a remarkable and distinguishable behavior...whether it's origins are innate or not.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC