Reply #229: Unfortunately, you choose to see what you want, in spite of the

[TankLV]

total amount of interisting facts concerning the events before, during, and after that horrible day.

If you were paying attention (hense, not supporting the "blinders" argument) you would know that the argument has been:

1) fact one - timeline evidence, video evidence, etc., to,
10,000) fact ten thousand - more of the above.

Conclusion: It cannot be just "cooincidence" or simple incompetance, but much more.

You just are not reading all of the incredible research people have brought to this forum - not necessarily all on this post - it would not be big enough to hold all of the evidence that has been collected.

You just choose not to read and see.

The line of argument is NOT the one that has been presented by you. Not by a long shot.

The main problem is, just why had no investigation been done? Why the stonewalling and delays and refusal to cooperate? That alone (just one of the MINOR reasons to support LIHOP, BTW) should raise the suspicions of anyone. But no one has asked any pertinent questions.

And, I keep asking: Why is it that when a democrat is under ivestigation, they search and find the most partisan, repuke to lead the investigation, and when a repuke deigns to be questioned, they search and find the most partisan repuke to lead the investigation?