You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: What does the blueness of New York matter? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
I_like_chicken Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What does the blueness of New York matter?
I don't think most New Yorkers, or Americans, consider themselves to be liberal or conservative, rather they consider themselves independent whether or not they are registered Dem or Rep. People think that its important to do whats best for the country based on the facts of the situation, and not on ideology. In order for Bush to be able to go to war, he had to convince the general public of the "facts" that Saddam was a threat and had WMD. Ideology would not be enough to convince people to go to war.

The idea that the NYTimes used Judith Miller in order to show they were not biased to save and increase the number of readers seems laughable. People do not care about the ideology of a paper, rather they care about how well it reports the facts. An attack on the ideology of the paper is in fact an attack on the ablitity of the paper to report the facts. If the paper cared about the perception that they were unable to report the facts because of their supposed ideology, they could have countered by opening up its newsroom to the public to show that their fact gathering techniques were sound. Instead they used a far right reporter to change their "facts" to fit those of the rest of the mainstream media. I do not believe for a second that the NYTimes believed what Judy Miller was reporting was true. The only explantion for the use of Judy Miller is that the NYTimes were co-conspirtors to decieve the public of the "facts" in order to persuade public opinion in favor of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC