You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Right, if it isn't govt-approved Reuters or AP, it might be dangerous. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Right, if it isn't govt-approved Reuters or AP, it might be dangerous.
This might be more appropriate in the editorials forum, but I see nothing in the article that can be shown to be untrue or questionable.

Because the writer is unknown to you it doesn't mean the writer is 'unknown'.

What possible benefit to Canada can result from closer integration with the US military on foreign adventures. How on earth can Graham call Canada's participation in the invasions of Afghanistan and Haiti "enhancing Canada's contribution to global security and peace building."

What a nightmare!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC