You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: sabotage? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
radiofreesrini Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. sabotage?
ever since this war began, i have had the strange feeling that Rumsfeld was sending a token US force to do the job of a massive one because he was playing some kind of deadly game of temptation with Iran. as i find out about the al-Zarqawi's CIA ties and the fake beheading of Nicholas Berg this hypothesis has re-emerged in my mind time and again.

a disaster is exactly what the neocons are brewing up in order to launch World War III. the events of this war are so cliche as to appear copied from a recipe book. abu ghraib was the Stanford Prison Experiment; falluja was the Warsaw Ghetto. the symbols conveyed to the Arab world are monopolized by the neocons, and they all seem to portray us in the worst possible light. i mean, "the enemy has a face. we're fighting Satan in Falluja"?! then going and bombing a bunch of minarets and killing hundreds of civilians?

i find it hard to believe that the images i summarized above are accidental. i feel that the military psyops people are trying to get the entire Arab world to hate us. are they trying to tempt Iran into invading Iraq while our Marines are so few and far between? i have always thought that Sun Tzu would never have counselled our involvement in Iraq. it looks like a setup to me. iran would just have to pinch off that little Strait of Hormuz and our kids would be TRAPPED in there, cut off from supplies and escape. of course, this kind of future would perhaps mean world war iii, it would definitely mean the end of america's infinite oil consumption, it could precipitate all kinds of chaos all around the world.

the only explanation is that bush, cheney, rumsfeld, rove, rice etc are psychotic and actually get off on the thought of death, murder, etc. i feel that cheney's involvement with flummoxing NORAD on september 11 is a smoking gun that points at his direct involvement in the terrible events of that day of infamy. 100,000 american soldiers cannot stave off an army of several million fanatic Iranians eager to kick the Great Satan out of their holy land. i worry that they have been set up to die for political reasons. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC