Reply #232: Let me ask you a question

[LiberalLovinLug]

...on the witnesses that you relied upon to convince yourself of his guilt, and now decided that because they recanted that they are not to be trusted.

Why would they do that? Wouldn't life be easier on them if in fact they were telling truth the first time, to stand by their word? Tell me why they would incur the wrath of the police and state by reversing their true testimony for a false one? What does it get them?

I do not buy for a minute that you are against the death penalty. There was enough doubt to warrant a new trial. Why would you oppose this? If you are so sure that there is enough evidence against him DESPITE most of the witnesses recanting? Maybe because he may be deemed not guilty thus making you look like the *biting my tongue* you are?