You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: Initial claims 457K. Continuing claims 4.34M (down from 4.382M) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Initial claims 457K. Continuing claims 4.34M (down from 4.382M)
http://www.briefing.com/Investor/Public/Calendars/EconomicReleases/claims.htm

Key Factors

•The lack of a sustained downward trend leaves little hope for a substantial positive surprise in tomorrow's employment report.
•According to the DOL, the continuing claims level was not adversely impacted by poor seasonal adjustments. Unfortunately, that does not mean the drop in claims is the result of increased hiring. Instead, it is most likely due to an acceleration of claimants running out of jobless benefits.
•Separately, emergency benefit levels remain in a seesaw trend as claims increased by 198,579 for the week ending Oct. 16 after declining by 260,318 for the week ending Oct. 9.

Big Picture

•New claims have dropped below 500,000, but they are still well above the typical levels found during the last recession. As major companies finish their labor restructuring, many of the newly unemployed are coming from smaller businesses. This tends to cause more hardship on Main Street as many of these workers are unprepared for their job loss.
_____________________________________________________________

The decrease in continuing claims "is most likely due to an acceleration of claimants running out of jobless benefits." Think the new majority in Congress will extend unemployment benefits? You know they think the unemployed are just lazy. And they won't want to reward laziness with any more benefits. They wouldn't want to run up the deficit helping lazy people. No, they want to run up the deficit giving tax breaks to the wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC