Reply #106: That is pure supposition and opinion, though, and I disagree.

[No Elephants]

When you're dealing in many millions, it's really easy for both the candidates and staff to charge things that are questionable, using broad categories. And so-called mistakes came to light from all those campaigns, even without investigations. As far as Bill Clinton, I see no reason to assume his general character was so far above Edwards.

We'll never know for certain, though, unless someone investigates all of them as carefully as Edwards is being investigated and that is not going to happen. Meanwhile, you'll have your opinion that Edwards was "more bad" than the rest and I'll have mine--that human nature is human nature.