You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #68: I'm not sure the Swiss Courts have any jurisdiction [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
68. I'm not sure the Swiss Courts have any jurisdiction
Edited on Wed Feb-25-09 01:34 PM by Hansel
I think the Swiss courts are going to take a pass on this one.

UBS exec admits bank’s sham tax shelters broke U.S. law
http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080717/REG/749563333

UBS admitted it broke U.S. law in setting up sham offshore tax shelters for wealthy Americans and agreed to work with U.S. authorities in reviewing 19,000 accounts to identify clients who may have committed tax fraud.

"Our compliance system had failures, and misconduct appears to have occurred,” Mark Branson, chief financial officer of UBS’s global wealth management unit, told a Senate panel today. “It is apparent now that our controls and supervision were inadequate.”

Mr. Branson also said UBS will discontinue offering offshore banking and securities services to American clients through branches that aren’t licensed in the U.S. The firm allowed its Swiss bankers to market securities and banking services on U.S. soil without a proper license from 2000 to 2007, according to a report released today by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

snip

“The U.S. government, particularly in this economy, is not going to blow up an international financial institution with a criminal indictment,’’ Jacob Frenkel, a former federal criminal and SEC prosecutor, said in an interview. “That, however, provides no protection or insulation for civil and criminal actions against individuals whose conduct is squarely within the focus of this alleged fraud.”


So basically it looks like they are not going after UBS criminally, but are going after some of its employees for civil and criminal activity, and the tax evaders. UBS has paid a fine and has agreed to release the names. I'm not sure they have a choice. What jurdiction would Swiss courts have over illegitimate and illegal activity conducted by "rouge" employees of one of its corporations operating in the U.S.? This is how they might get around the Swiss laws: These employees were operating without proper U.S. licenses outside of UBS policies on U.S. soil with clients who were fully aware they were breaking the law (conspiracy) so these were not legitimate banking transactions and have no protection under the Swiss privacy laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC