Reply #10: Siegelman supporters call for search into e-mails

[struggle4progress]

By Ben Evans • July 24, 2008

... At issue is a series of e-mails that arose in 2006 suggesting that two jurors had outside influence as they decided Siegelman's bribery conviction. After he was found guilty, Siegelman sought a new trial over the e-mails, printed copies of which had been mailed to defense attorneys.

U.S. District Judge Mark Fuller denied the motion for a new trial, ruling that the allegations were unsubstantiated. Siegelman has cited the issue as a central point in his ongoing appeal.

Two weeks ago, the head of the Justice Department's appellate division, Patty Merkamp Stemler, informed Siegelman's attorneys that the department had discovered undisclosed information about the controversy as attorneys prepared for the appeal. In a July 8 letter, Stemler wrote that while Siegelman's mistrial proceedings were pending, acting U.S. Attorney Louis Franklin asked U.S. postal inspectors to try to determine who sent the e-mails through the mail ...

But the information produced for prosecutors and given to the judge was never passed along to Siegelman's attorneys for cross-examination ...

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080724/NEWS02/807240315