You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Too dangerous for troops? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too dangerous for troops?
Wow, that's a really successful state set up there. Just as well the US Joint Chiefs of Staff were so confident in July:

The al-Qaida basically does not operate in Afghanistan, although they'll make attempts because they stay on the border areas between Afghanistan and Pakistan. They'll make attempts, I think, to thwart progress in Afghanistan.

Certainly, there are remnants of Taliban, well-trained, good fighters, been fighting for a long time, very capable, that will -- that are currently pretty much staying to the hills.

http://fpc.state.gov/fpc/49524.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC