You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #7: Could it be
[View All]
pa28
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message |
|
that the papers recognized the threat or even predicted the specific mode of terrorist attack? Do they outline a counteroffensive that would have stopped 9-11? If true it would follow that * promptly filed these warning away in cabinet 13. Sorry to speculate but I can't imagine what else it would be. If these papers contained material showing complacency on the part of the Clinton administration they would be in the public record by now.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.