You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #84: Not really. Constitutional rights and human rights are different. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
84. Not really. Constitutional rights and human rights are different.
I'm real big fan of human rights and even the guy that authored the first known document on human rights. That's Cyrus the Great of the Persian Empire. Some of our Constitutional rights are duplications of human rights like freedom of religion. Not a real popular subject around here. But a human right none the less. But our Constitutional rights are protection from governmental power. Why in the hell would you or anyone else want to offer protections from our government to foreigners hell bent on destroying Americans and America? The very government constitutionally charged with stopping these individuals. I'll also take this time to point out another part of our constitution. Article 3, Section III. Treason. It's the only crime declared by the constitution. That says you cannot give an enemy Aid or Comfort. Your wanting to give them both aid and comfort by giving them Constitutional rights to protect them from the power of our government. What you are protecting them from is the governments power to stop their attacks upon us.

The human rights in the constitution I'm not worried about. They are redundant. They also appear in international laws that we are bound by. Sure they can practice their religion here and even be free of cruel and unusual punishment. But being free from unreasonable search and seizure is not a human right. I don't see why it would be a big deal to deny these protection from the power of our government to foreigners. When all they have to do is present a compelling government interest and SCOTUS will deny that right to even American citizens. I also don't legal precedence being set by cases involving foreigners who's only purpose for being here is to destroy us or our way of life. Why not kill two birds with one stone? They can destroy us with bombs and destroy our way of life with legal precedences set by the trial resulting from the bombing. Basically I don't want foreigners creating legal arguments or compelling interests that will also take away my rights. They don't have the same interests or stake in our country and shouldn't have the same rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC