You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Credit to whom credit is due. And I think it is due to Jon Eisenberg [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Credit to whom credit is due. And I think it is due to Jon Eisenberg
and his team (not sure if he handled this District Court case to the end). Please give credit to the good lawyers who tirelessly defend our rights -- yours and mine.

Here are excerpts from an Jon Eisenberg's statements in an interview published in California Lawyer's 2009 SuperLawyer edition:

President Bush has freely admitted that his administration committed warrantless electronic surveillance, violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. That's a felony, according to title 50, section 1809 of the United States Code. So President Bush is a felon. It's that simple.

Will he ever be brought to justice? Evidently not by a criminal prosecution, in which the Obama administration seems to have little interest. I'm doing my best to see that he's held to account under FISA's civil liability provision, section 1810 of title 50.

. . . .

During the Al-Haramain case you wrote a response to a government brief that you were not allowed to see. How does one go about doing that?

It was quite a challenge. It wasn't just that we had to speculate as to what might be in the secret DOJ brief; the conditions under which we wrote our secret response were onerous, approaching the bizarre: We were required to write the brief under guard in the U.S. Attorney's office in San Francisco; we were forbidden from preparing any notes for the brief-writing session; the DOJ retained sole possession of the brief we produced; and the DOJ has refused to allow us to review the brief since we wrote it. Litigation doesn't get any weirder than that.

. . . .

Lots more at
http://www.superlawyers.com/california-northern/article/QandA-with-Jon-B-Eisenberg/e098c6f7-cb78-482c-b0b2-07107af5f499.html

Please check out the interview. And remember, when you are thanking the troops and the local police that it's lawyers like Jon Eisenberg who guard your freedom. Thank them too.

On top of being a great, great lawyer, Jon Eisenberg is a good man as you will learn from the article. A man who has such loving things to say about his wife after a long marriage is a good man, sight unseen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC