You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: False dichotomy. THERE COULD BE MORE OPTIONS. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
59. False dichotomy. THERE COULD BE MORE OPTIONS.
Especially if we were to turn our attention to the things that we can actually do something successfull about, e.g. the fact that we consume and throw away something like 25% of all of the fossil fuel energy on Earth. What effect do you think it might have had on the development of geo-politics if we had never been so dependent upon Oil Kings in the first place? Or were seriously and meaningfully reducing our dependence now?

What attitude do you think we would have toward Afghanistan if it weren't in that region? Why would our attitude be different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC