You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #33: I don't think the "LOL" argument is admissible in federal court
[View All]
Dreamer Tatum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-20-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
33. I don't think the "LOL" argument is admissible in federal court |
|
There are issues here. The tax is CLEARLY aimed at fewer than 100 people. Anyone else caught in the crossfire would have a legitimate beef, too.
Remember: federal taxes were ALREADY PAID on bonuses that would be subject to the new tax. That itself calls the incremental tax into question.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.