Reply #155: Thanks for acknowledging my opinion as my opinion and arguing

[Festivito]

the part that did not matter, that I only put in so it would not be the argument. So, I gather what happened is that I posted my opinion because I'm entitled to have an opinion and not because I'd like to interact with others about that opinion and it is that thinking, thinking that others would interact with me about my opinion that makes me asinine when I would have the audacity to imagine when they did not interact with me surrounding my opinion that they were somehow ignoring my opinion.

Oh, silly silly me, the only thing worth discussing is an errant word choice in a part that does not matter to the opinion, that opinion, again, is only there because I have a right to have an opinion and would not in my wildest imaginings find others engaging it in discussion since the right to have an opinion is apparently all that matters.

Well, that judicial decision made to be called law or whatever you deem appropriate to call it is overturnable. And, if my opinion is correct, it should be overturned. And I did post it with reasoning so some major chode would not pose some lame "my opinion is the opposite" as though such name is a mere indicative.