|
There's no need for a contest of fascinations, provided you are indeed fond of your own.
No, I did not simply view what you wrote as a lot of words. I will say that it was a lot of words to express your point. I'm sure I'm not the first person to ever imply that you might be verbose. If I am the first, let me add that you write well, albeit long, and that I tend to be overly brief, or at least I try to be, bad boy that I am.
Adding a program of education for a school does not automatically "compromise their educational programs." Nice attempt to frame, but no.
A memory program would enhance today's schools, not compromise them. It does not matter so much what is memorized, it builds the ability. Having different religions teach it offers diversity. Finding secular material for those not involved with religion would not be hard. (Understand that I offer this as example of part of what a religion class might offer, I'm not trying to be complete such as to receive a treatise on my quickly developed example.)
Aside, there is a bit of judgment in your cute attack. For a little fun, let me go on a bit. About that tree, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. (A rather lengthy name) Man, mankind, disfruits of this tree, enjoys this tree. Enjoys judging, judging what's good, judging what's bad. And that is his downfall, judging others.
I hope you see more than just a delusion when you look at things you judge as worth the chuckle.
|