You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: By those standards, then I AM an explosive 'expert'. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
TheFriendlyAnarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. By those standards, then I AM an explosive 'expert'.
(I don't use bomb here, because 'bomb' is a term that implies and explosive device designed to create death and destruction). You would need blasting caps. C-4 explosive needs decent blasting caps as well (Possible to make at home, but dangerous and not particularly fun), and wouldn't produce much a a bang without a containment system (say, a grenade). 6 ounces of uncontained C-4 is less than what you would use in a grenade (And let me remind everyone, the explosion of a grenade does pretty much ZERO; it's the shrapnel that does most of the work). You can burn C-4 without it ever exploding (it's actually made from fuel tablets that are designed for, among other things, campfires) Assuming it was C-4, at most it would have killed her and possibly burned a few other people(assuming she met the numerous requirements for detonation. It could be more likened to carrying around a handful of M-80's).

Next point- actual C-4 is difficult to make (The binding agents are less easy to work with). Assuming your going this route, C-3 would be easier to make, and wouldn't look like military C-4.

C-x explosives are also much more complicated and require more dangerous synthesis methods than many explosives. It can be done by anyone with a basic understanding of the synthesis process, but overall, there are much better things to do if you're actually sick enough to blow someone up.

Flashing lights are pointless. They aren't needed in ANY explosive device. The only conceivable reason for their usage would be in a timed device where you wanted to let whoever saw it know how close to detonation it was (Also a bad idea).

So, at most all they should have done was ask to get a closer look. A 10 second inspection would be more than enough to determine that it was no threat. Should she have worn it? Well, the ignorance of our system being so overwhelming, I would say no. No point in making the people who are supposed to be protecting us want to shit themselves. The charges are police over-reaction and them trying to make it look like they weren't as stupid as they actually are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC