You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #35: No, we know
[View All]
way2tacky
(28 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-26-03 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
that bin Laden is responsible. He's been behind terrorist attacks on the US for a decade now. If Clinton and Bush can BOTH agree on it, I'm inclined to believe.
Doesn't he have to be a UN member to be tried at the Hague? And he's not a US citizen, which makes him ineligible to reap the benefit of our judicial system. So what should happen to him?
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread