You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #120: Ahhh, yes I read it that way now. Your view on 04 is not moot though
[View All]
54anickel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-24-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #119 |
120. Ahhh, yes I read it that way now. Your view on 04 is not moot though |
|
when you set your sights on '06 and '08. You may not think there was fraud but you must admit that the integrity of the entire system is at risk with some of the new voting systems. I'm glad to see Diebold et al being challenged. When election integrity is questionable, it's probably best to remove the possible questions, no?
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.