U.S.: Rice Miscasts Policy on Torture (Human Rights Watch)

[Up2Late]

(This is directly from the Human Rights Watch website, it just came up in my RSS reader.)

U.S.: Rice Miscasts Policy on Torture

Remarks at Start of Europe Visit Leave Concerns Unanswered

(New York, December 6, 2005) – In remarks at the start of a five-day trip to Europe, the U.S. Secretary of State mischaracterized the U.S. government’s “rendition” of terrorist suspects to make it appear lawful, Human Rights Watch said today.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the U.S. government had not transported detainees to other countries “for the purpose” of interrogation using torture, but she failed to mention that the United States has transported detainees to countries such as Egypt and Syria where it knows torture is commonplace. The Convention Against Torture, to which the United States is a party, outlaws such a practice.

Secretary Rice also failed to address a central concern of European governments: that the CIA has allegedly held detainees in secret locations in Europe. “Condi Rice can't deny that secret prisons exist, because they do," said Tom Malinowski, Washington advocacy director of Human Rights Watch. "But she can't say where they are because that would embarrass the United States and put the host countries in an impossible position -- something the Bush administration should have thought of when it launched this shortsighted policy."

On renditions, Secretary Rice merely cited historical precedents for suspects being rendered to the United States for prosecution and suggested that legal methods for detaining and interrogating suspects were not always appropriate. In fact, the U.S. government has frequently resorted to extra-legal rendition to other countries as a means of interrogating detainees indefinitely without judicial interference. “Secretary Rice made extra-legal rendition sound like just another form of extradition,” said Malinowski. “In fact, it’s a form of kidnapping and ‘disappearing’ someone entirely outside the law.”

<http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/12/05/usint12147.htm>
(more at link above)