You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: These are really bad deductions - they should be gone [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. These are really bad deductions - they should be gone
seriously. After returning the top bracket tax cuts, but they should be gone nonetheless.

The mortgage interest deduction is a de facto tax on renters. Renters don't get to take it, ergo they must pay more than non-renters. The subset of the population that rents is poorer than the subset that owns. It's a regressive deduction. Perhaps better than eliminating it, it should be reduced from two houses & $1 million to one house and half a million, but that is merely a matter of degree.

Furthermore, all of the 'homeownership' tax deductions are really and truly a means of transferring wealth from workers to landowners. As we have seen, easy access to money (low interest rates) doesn't necessarily make homeownership more affordable, it makes property more expensive. As soon as most people can afford a more expensive house, house prices rise.

More explicitly, land prices rise. You can still commission construction at $125-$250 a square foot. It's buying that lot that gets more expensive - and there is no feedback loop. If construction costs rise, new contracters put their hats in the ring, and new construction methods arise (think engineered wood trusses v. dimensional lumber as lumber prices have risen). However, there is no feedback loop with land. No matter how expensive it gets, no one is making more of it.

As for the employer paid health insurance deduction: eliminating this is almost necessarily the first step towards universal healthcare. Currently, if it is possible at all, it is very expensive for an individual to buy healthcare. Corporate-sponsored healthcare puts the employer in the position of the customer to the insurer. In other words, the insurer must keep the employer, who pays the bills, happy, much more than he must keep the insured employee happy.

I expect most of you will disagree with my assessments here, but I stand by them. These are two of the worst tax deductions there are, and they SHOULD be eliminated.

After they roll back his earlier tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC