Reply #207: In the parlance of US women, those speakers were "making nice"

[Mairead]

Note that their statements were very general and assigned no personal responsibility to anyone. They're not full-strength indictments, nor are meant to be. Everyone can agree such general statements, which undercuts the ability of the guilty to shift focus by claiming the speakers were overstating the case.

But the facts are that with no evidence AT ALL beyond him being non-AS and leaving a building being surveilled, they shot him dead as their first choice of action.

That doesn't sound like the action of people concerned with the rights of their victim, or the possibility that they might make an irreversible mistake.