Reply #168: You really should book that course.

[beam me up scottie]

I don't know how else to interpret your inability to read this statement:

"Speculating about conspiracy when there is evidence of none may be reasonable activity but it is still speculation."

You are engaging in speculation.

But you and the other peeps argue as if it were fact, and that is what has been addressed in my posts.

If one is unable to tell the difference between fact and fiction, that is ignorance.

If one is able to tell the difference, and argues one as the other, that is retrospective falsification.