You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #186: I definitely said "at the risk of oversimplifying" for a reason. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #183
186. I definitely said "at the risk of oversimplifying" for a reason.
Edited on Wed May-04-05 11:58 PM by TahitiNut
Consider for a moment that, in general, the civilian justice system will forego prosecution of small fry in order to get the big fish. While I oppose exoneration, I understand and won't let the perfect be the enemy of the second best. I would prefer greater penalties for those with greater power and authority, but complicity should always be punishable.

The Military Justice (oxymoron) System is the opposite. The system itself, under the authority of the trial judges, does not accept blame of the command as a defense, nor does it grant immunity in seeking higher culpability. It's a system that's designed to reinforce authority, not make it more honest.

Yes, abu Ghraib is most definitely a combat zone. At the time of these events, the prisoner/guard ratio was probably about 5 times greater than anything permitted by regulations, they got shelled, and the guards/troops were subject to attacks from both outside and inside. More significantly, they were operating under the military's combat "laws" and regulations ... and not in the slightest way subject to any civil authority. None. Nada.

Regarding what constitutes torture - when the administration's most senior legal authorities are promulgating treatments that both I and you would regard as torture, just what burden can be reasonably placed on the back of a PFC to make such a legal judgment? After all, when you're KILLING people, including civilians, it's tough to find a moral compass.

Yes. I think it is. You think it is. I wonder whether we'd risk being fragged, shot, or given an assignment that was certain death for not "going with the flow." The military has some very effective ways of "cleaning out the ranks." And there ain't a GI in a combat zone that doesn't know it. There's REAL enforcement for ya.

In the final analysis, our failure as a nation to justly and fairly prosecute and punish war crimes makes us ALL responsible. Why? The "justice system" is our avatar. That's why the Nuremberg Trials had to be held in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC