You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Group formed to oppose gay marriage ban [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:23 PM
Original message
Group formed to oppose gay marriage ban
Advertisements [?]
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D87A2R801.html

The institution of marriage is in crisis but not because of gays, says a Democratic political consultant who has formed a group to fight passage of a state constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriages.

Threats to marriage are no-fault divorce and domestic violence, said Jason Stanford, whose group is called Practice What You Preach. He said the Legislature should concentrate on laws that would bolster traditional marriages instead of grandstanding on what he sees as a discriminatory amendment that accomplishes nothing.

"That amendment, win or lose, means gay marriage is still illegal in Texas. Win or lose, marriage is still in crisis in Texas," he said. "The question is whether the Texas Legislature is going to quit the hypocrisy and focus on the real problems."

Cathie Adams, president of the Texas Eagle Forum and a top social conservative supporter of the amendment, said she agreed with Stanford on ending easy divorces and reducing domestic violence.
But the definition of marriage is fundamental, and I hope he would change his mind about that," Adams said. While a state law approved last year defines marriage as solely between a man and a woman, a court could theoretically overturn the statute, Adams said. The constitutional amendment is needed because "if we did not have a favorable Supreme Court, we could be in jeopardy of losing the definition of marriage," Adams said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC