|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Zorra
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:41 PM Original message |
HELP! This *April 6 *Brookfield Newspaper has printed that the votes were already counted on Apr. 6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. Dunno; haven't studied, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Hot tub time machine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. That was posted yesterday? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. so then the results were released to the local paper yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. The story you reference is merely a "yay, us!" not, hey,the clerk left us out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. But how did they know the results of the election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. The CITY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. And how come the local paper did not mention any error by Nickolaus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. They didn't know then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I would believe the theory is that no one pieced it all together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. The Clerk SAID she caught it Wed around noon and that they'd been reviewing since. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. I wonder what time this was posted - online only or in newspaper too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Why does that matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:15 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. I really havent any idea why you are yelling but it's annoying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. One can yell over the internets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-11 12:36 AM Response to Reply #32 |
48. The totals for the county need to be retallied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. I think you are confused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Brookfield. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. LOL. Yeah Brookfield :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. Good enough question, although I do remember reading Nickolaus say that she realized the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bound by Honor
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Nickalaus needs to be indicted. She has been investigated for electioneering/election fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. Because .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. so are you saying that Brookfield tabulated their own votes from all their precincts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Brookfield is a city. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Ok. That makes sense. Thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. k/r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. The Brookfield newspaper got the numbers from Brookfield, not the county clerk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Ewwwww. This gives me a sinking feeling -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bound by Honor
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. The Waukesha County Clerk needs an indictment, fast. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Waukesha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bound by Honor
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
35. We don't care if you want to call it Waukeshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
29. What the newspaper article proves is that those were that city's numbers before the snafu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. how so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:18 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. The city of Brookfield transmitted their number to the county on Tuesday night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. that is my hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. unfortunately, it means the numbers may be legitimate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Maybe yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. The city of Brookfield came out and said that they tranmitted the numbers Tuesday night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:38 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. From Wisconsin Reporter ... here ya go ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Becareful. Ya don't want to start to sound like 'Glenn Beck'. ;) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-11 12:01 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Hell I haven't even reached Andrea Mitchell or your standard CNN reporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-11 12:07 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Statement from the Brookfield Mayor .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
33. Here's the run down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Yes. This. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal life
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-11 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
41. very interesting.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mazzarro
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-11 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
49. I've seen a few people on this board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-11 09:49 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I said "appears". That word means something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC