|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:41 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do you support military action in Libya? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. Did you vote in your poll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I dunno about LoZoccolo, but I usually wait until a few others have voted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
30. Deleted message |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sorry but I can't get over the feeling we will be left holding the bag on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. 12 countries have signed on and the US obviously is taking a backseat role now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
50. Yup no confidence in revolutionaries and no confidence we are capable of getting out of wars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #50 |
80. I believe in them. They held two cities without arms for a month. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fittosurvive (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 02:52 AM Response to Reply #16 |
113. Who are the revolutionaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #113 |
133. They're like the Egyptians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fittosurvive (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:25 AM Response to Reply #133 |
135. Are willing to sacrifice your life for revolution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jacquelope (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. Absolutely not. I oppose imposing our will on other nations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. It's not really our will, it's the will of the international community. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jacquelope (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. I hate atrocities like this as much as anyone, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:16 PM Original message |
I don't know, but that's not the determining factor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
44. You said it was the will of the international community |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:31 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. I think the U.N. is an excellent indicator, and the best. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:36 PM Response to Reply #51 |
99. And the entire UN voted for intervention? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. No, but the Security Council did. This isn't a unilateral U.S. move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:43 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. Not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #103 |
107. I do think the unanimous decision by the Security Council (abstentions included), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 11:38 AM Response to Reply #107 |
118. There are 15 nations in the UNSC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 11:56 AM Response to Reply #118 |
121. It's not. But neither China or Russia vetoed the decision, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Who all is in the UNSC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 12:19 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. But what Libya does with its people is, rightfully. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 09:34 AM Response to Reply #124 |
136. So if enough western nations decide it is their business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 05:42 PM Response to Reply #51 |
130. Like Iraq, it is the usual suspects who voted for intervention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xicano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. Our country, our military, our will... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:12 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Well that's not real international law. Libya voted for the U.N. resolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #34 |
75. +1, n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CommonSensePLZ (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:08 AM Response to Reply #34 |
139. +1 BILLION - This is NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jacquelope (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. +100,000,000!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xicano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Welcome to the DU jacquelop and thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
102. Nonsense. We have the veto power which we use to stop the international community from imposing its |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xicano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. +10 I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. Our armed forces are doing what the UNSC requests, unanimously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
60. +1. There are justifications for force. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
73. +1, n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bertha Venation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. too scary to know... don't know how I would respond if I were me on a better day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnroshan (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. France, Britain, Italy, Turkey, UAE, Quatar, US and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Definitely he's a freak and needs to pack his bags. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. 12 countries, they're in my Libya Revolution thread (Day 31). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
78. Plus he's a madman and out of control. Those there that side with him are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. I wonder if Mubarak hired African mercenaries to massacre Egyptians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Almost 700 Egyptians died and they're "calling for intervention" for Yemen and Bahrain... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Maybe they should "call for intervention" before they get murdered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. Kim Jong Il has killed more than a few thousand of his own people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. I would love to topple Kim Jong Il if there was a popular protest to oust him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. Seems then that we are rewarding those despots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
66. Yes, that is true. I don't like the double standard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #66 |
100. The message is clear: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:47 PM Response to Reply #100 |
105. *kill them all* is easier to write on a message board than to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 11:40 AM Response to Reply #105 |
119. I am basing it on reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #100 |
108. Yeah, but as the other poster said, easier said than done (see: Libya). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 12:07 PM Response to Reply #108 |
123. Developing nukes helped too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. I hate all wars as much as almost everybody else do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. If not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #42 |
67. Which is why we should support the UN. Make it more and more legit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 09:43 AM Response to Reply #36 |
137. We've already crossed the line with just invoking airstrikes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. Tentatively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sad sally (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
91. the old slippery slope, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yes. Sovereignty does not include the authority to slaughter your own citizens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. Indeed, the resolution's pretty specific about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. I believe you're correct. Responsiblity to Protect has not been invoked before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:16 PM Original message |
At least in situations this far gone, yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:42 PM Response to Reply #28 |
57. R2P is an excellent international legal development, imo. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. I'm really enthusiastic about it and hope it holds up over time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Yep. It's another welcomed exception to the outdated concept of absolute sovereignty. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Urban Prairie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
12. I think that the US had enough on its "war plate" beforehand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. Absolutely no way.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groundloop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. A hesitant, nervous - yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Northerner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
20. Absolutely hell no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
22. Do you support Libya sinking a US warship? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. huh? that doesn't even make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. The US just fired missiles into a country killing people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnroshan (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. I'm glad that not everyone is so shortsighted that they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:24 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. The UN just intervened in a civil war that was instigated by a violent coup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnroshan (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #46 |
56. Instigated by a violent coup?!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Amazing how oil countries get put to the top of the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #46 |
64. Pretty sure that's the opposite of a fact. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #46 |
69. So you believe Gaddafi's propaganda that it was "terrorists." Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Considering neither you or I were there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:32 PM Response to Reply #70 |
82. I may not have been "there" but I was able to sift through the information from both sides. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. ridiculous and truly "shortsighted" to think they're doing it for humanitarian reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Who cares? If there is a legitimate humanitarian reason to intervene, why does it matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. LOL. you go cheer on the war, i'll go protest against it. 180 degrees, as always with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
71. Of course you will. But that doesnt answer the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #71 |
89. And it's a good question too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #54 |
104. I assume you cheered on the Iraq war then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. Lybia does not even have the capability to do that (afaik), hence my original question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
84. When did that happen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #84 |
132. Are you saying it is not possible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #22 |
109. Unlikely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #109 |
131. Hubris is an exploitable weakness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bryan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
37. This poll is too binary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
41. Yes, but nobody cares why, so I won't bore you with my reasons. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marblehead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
43. This will probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:24 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. "Who is picking up the tab for this?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
63. The couple dozen participating nations, for one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
45. I'm conflicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
49. Absolutely NOT. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
53. The way Obama/Hillary did this.......NO! They used Bush's tired UN Resolution BLAH instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
58. No "I dunno" or "other" option? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synicus Maximus (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
59. Obama's announcement about Libya sounds a lot like what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 08:56 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. Of course this time there is a broad coalition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #59 |
79. Except that there actually WERE calls from Libyan rebels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMightyFavog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
72. As long as this intervention involves only the use of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #72 |
86. Yep. The resolution is very specific about excluding ground forces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
74. We should have done this weeks ago. And commit ground troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:40 PM Response to Reply #74 |
88. It still is to a point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
76. NO. Not for the U.S. to be involved. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
77. Ultimately yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #77 |
96. Hey how's that warmongering going???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
81. Hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
83. 101 so-called 'progressives' in favor of letting Libyan people getting murdered by maniac dictator.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Since when is this a progressive site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #85 |
92. Hey, you were the clueless person who started another thread in support of poor Muammar... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:04 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Excuse me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:05 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Come on, own up to it. You want us to leave poor Muammar alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. I don't think it's any of our business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:14 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. Yeah, let the Libyans DIE! Not our problem! We only care about 'the people' when they're in the US! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anneboleyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 12:30 AM Response to Reply #98 |
111. Problem is, as has been pointed out repeatedly, we care about *some* people, not all peoples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 05:25 PM Response to Reply #111 |
128. So according to you, we shouldn't save ANY people and let them ALL die? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #92 |
126. personal attack and false accusation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Letting Libyans die because you want to pat yourself on the back about your principles... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dash87 (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 11:32 PM Response to Reply #83 |
110. Now, instead they get to be murdered by our troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 12:35 AM Response to Reply #83 |
112. Was the poll edited? I didn't see that option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 09:45 PM Response to Reply #83 |
134. Have you signed up to be part of the invading forces to topple Kim Jong Il? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marblehead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
87. I stand with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
90. I favor specific and limited actions. I don't think yes or no is the way to answer the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. Absolutely. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-11 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
106. Depends on the definition of military action. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 03:15 AM Response to Original message |
114. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinee (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 03:25 AM Response to Original message |
115. No blood for oil! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
116. Not at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
117. Yes, with my tax dollars. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
120. Hell no. Sorry, we need to mind our own business and focus on fixing our country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
125. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-20-11 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
129. Two wars are not enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
138. There's not much point in having a United Nations if you disregard its deliberations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 23rd 2024, 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC